-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> Whereas SSP began as a simple idea as a means of deciding whether an
> unsigned message should have been signed, it has morphed into an
> effort to validate the From field. That is a very, very different
> goal.
>
> While DKIM has the goal of assigning *any* identity to a message, so
> that that identity can be assessed, the current work on SSP is
> attempting to instead validate authorship.
+1. Well stated.
You summarize my recent grouchiness very well. I think that the
attempt to validate authorship is not only impossible, but a complete
or incomplete implementation of same is a bad idea.
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.6.3
Charset: US-ASCII
wj8DBQFHjpnwsTedWZOD3gYRAluIAJ9ua0/40kqzLYofiqb9dh81jiGi6gCeMmBP
gsZhqS2UugZahai5GVLAvfk=
=zSbP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
