>> You haven't looked at abuse.net's SPF record, have you? > >No - I recalled the articles where you exlained how you >deal with this flood, and why you don't like SPF FAIL.
It didn't make any difference, since nobody of any importance rejects for -all. Followups to some place other than the DKIM list, please, although this is probably a useful data point for anyone who thinks that SSP "strict" will be effective. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
