John Levine wisely repeated: > SSP desperately needs real life experience before we start twiddling it. > > I'd like to go with the current modest version and come back after > we've found out what's useful and what isn't.
+1 > The reporting address sounds like a fine idea, but as we've already > seen there's all sorts of questions that would benefit from > experience, like how much you redact, and to what extent asking for > reports would be an invitation to be mailbombed. I'd think we can gain reporting experience on an ad-hoc basis without outwardly modifying ASP. This is probably more of an interop topic, though. -- J.D. Falk Receiver Products Return Path _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
