Please. Let's not prolong this. I hope Mike doesn't answer you. Stephen.
J D Falk wrote: >> I'd like the chairs to clarify whether treating a working group like a >> debating club is appropriate. I gave my experience as an implementor >> in good faith. > > I'd be likely to agree with you that existing usage should be preserved, > but in my experience there is no existing usage. You state that there > is existing usage, but refuse to say where. > > In the midst of the conversation, there's also been some frustration > expressed. That may not have been necessary. > > Have I accurately characterized the conversation thus far? > > Given this exchange, what do you expect will happen? > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
