>I object to FroDo as a potential and unnecessary trademark issue with >parties that have a history of litigation and indeed are currently in >litigation between themselves.
You may be confusing trademark and copyright. A quick search at the USPTO shows trademark registrations for FRODO for alcoholic beverages, snacks (pizza in particular), key chains, and action figures. I see no trademarks related to computers. There are trademarks on SSP for fire extinguishers, offshore floating platforms, sports equipment, lubricating oils, air filters, insurance claims software, web based online insurance claim processing, medical needles, shaft pulleys, contract food services and food service management, marine propulsion motors, computer chips with embedded software for secure data transmission over a global computer network, gold jewelry, steam engineering services, specialized motors, packaging foam, battery chargers, and pipe fittings. There is only one trademark on ADSP for radio transceivers. I would consider staying away from SSP due to that trademark on data transmission security chips, but it's hard to see how it would be an issue for FRODO or ADSP. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
