Wietse Venema wrote:
> Frank Ellermann:
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Would it be better if "error" were a specifically defined
>>> result in addition to "unknown" / "all" / "discardable"?
>> The fourth bullet in chapter 3.2 "ASP results" offers "the
>> domain does not exist" after "unknown"/"all"/"discardable".
>>
>> I-D.kucherawy-sender-auth-header chapter 2.4.2 "ASP results"
>> lists this as "nxdomain". IMHO good enough, or do you have
>> something else in mind ? Let's s/ASP/ADSP/g + WGLC, s.v.p.
>
> Sounds reasonable. I expect many will implement NXDOMAIN as a
> fourth ADSP lookup result in some way or another.
>
> This explains more easily than my earlier claim (an NXDOMAIN result
> cannot correspond with one of "unknown" / "all" / "discardable").
Dave Crocker:
> Sorry for being confused, but I now can't tell whether the focus
> is on an NXDomain for the _adsp.<domain> string that is queried
> for ADSP, or the <domain> name to which it is associated.
I am talking about DNS lookup #2 in ADSP: the author domain.
_adsp.domainkey.example.com IN TXT (NXDOMAIN -> "unknown").
example.com A IN (NXDOMAIN -> "nxdomain").
By including "nxdomain" as a verifier result we can eliminate
a confusion and frustration.
Wietse
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
