Re: [ietf-dkim] Progressing ADSP (Was: Re: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-06 (fwd))

[Arvel Hathcock]

> It might be no harm if folks who do think ADSP should
> go ahead would respond to this saying so. 

+1

Arvel


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html