Would there be enough interest in the topic to have a BOF next month?

        Tony Hansen
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jim Fenton wrote:
> Well, it is explicitly out of scope for the working group, and if
> discussion on VBR is conducted here it might tend to confuse people into
> thinking that we don't understand that.
> 
> ASRG lists, perhaps?
> 
> -Jim
> 
> Dave CROCKER wrote:
>> The draft doesn't specify a discussion venue.  I believe the plan is to 
>> request 
>> Informational RFC status.
>>
>> With respect to the IETF, is there a better place for discussion than the 
>> DKIM list?
>>
>> d/
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: I-D Action:draft-hoffman-dac-vbr-04.txt
>> Date: Thu,  9 Oct 2008 08:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
>> directories.
>>
>>      Title           : Vouch By Reference
>>      Author(s)       : P. Hoffman, et al.
>>      Filename        : draft-hoffman-dac-vbr-04.txt
>>      Pages           : 12
>>      Date            : 2008-10-09
>>
>> This document describes the Vouch By Reference (VBR) protocol.  VBR
>> is a protocol for adding third-party certification to email.  It
>> permits independent third parties to certify the owner of a domain
>> name that is associated with received mail.
>>
>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoffman-dac-vbr-04.txt
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
>> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
>> Internet-Draft.
>>
>>
>>   
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to