Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Mike Adkins had an interesting suggestion where he'd use d=aol.com to > sign outbound messages, and i=g...@aol.com, b...@aol.com and > susp...@aol.com to denote various reputation scores that aol's filters > assigned an outbound message. > > This would allow aol to separate mail into different streams at their > end, and it'd allow receiving ISPs aware of this i= classification to > specialcase their filters to watch for i=bad or i=suspect email from > aol.
and why is that better, or worse, than d=good.aol.com, d=bad.aol.com, d=suspect.aol.com? note your reliance on "ISPs aware of this i= classification". It means that the mechanism won't scale, since we cannot assume that an arbitrary receiver will be aware of an arbitrary signer's scheme. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
