On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Dave CROCKER <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote: > It looks as if the two of you are agreeing that the i= value is indeed > opaque to a receiver.
Cant speak for madkins but that's my impression. I would also add "often irrelevant" besides "opaque" -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.li...@gmail.com) _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
