On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Jeff Macdonald <jmacdon...@e-dialog.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 04:14:02PM -0500, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: > >>Signer does not necessarily have to equal sender for DKIM base. This >>is one of the reasons I tend to fall into the "d=" camp. > > Don't forget i= is also in control of the signer too. An author/sender > does not control it.
Which would kind of make it redundant? _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
