On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote: > Jim Fenton: >> I'd like to see if there is consensus for my proposal to remove the term >> before suggesting specific language. > > I suggest: you propose a concrete replacement, and if it is better, > then we adopt it.
+1 I personally think "opaque" is an appropriate term. It's a pretty common use of the term. However, I am likely going to be fine with suggested replacement text. Regards, Al -- Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com -- Chicago, IL, USA _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
