Steve Atkins wrote: > It's a work in progress to provide operational documentation for > typical senders who want to use DKIM, but for whom the dry > RFC-style specification isn't as helpful as a more HOWTO set > of docs.
That's been a big problem when talking to operationally-minded folks -- which includes a very large percentage of likely implementers. Steve's document is a good start, and I've made a bit of an attempt with a blog series currently ongoing on returnpath.net and CircleID, but we need more people who actually understand DKIM -- all of whom are on this list -- to write in a more readable manner about what it really means and how it really works. -- J.D. Falk Return Path Inc http://www.returnpath.net/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
