On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 02:29:52PM -0700, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Eliot Lear wrote: >>> 8. RFC4871 Section 2.11 Identity Assessor >>> >>> Old: >>> The name of the module that consumes DKIM's primary payload, the >>> responsible Signing Domain Identifier (SDID). It can optionally >>> consume the Agent or User Identifier (AUID) value, if provided to >>> the module. >>> >>> New: >>> The name of the module that consumes DKIM's mandatory payload, the >>> responsible Signing Domain Identifier (SDID). Other DKIM values >>> can also be delivered this module; however this additional activity >>> is outside the scope of the DKIM signature specification. >> >> Replace "Other DKIM values" to "Other information". >> >> My logic: what the assessor consumes beyond the SDID is outside the >> scope of the spec. > >And add "by" between "delivered" and "this". > >After that, +1.
+1 -- Jeff Macdonald jmacdon...@e-dialog.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
