Barry Leiba wrote: > The new text has all been > agreed to on this list over the last week, in the three sub-threads > that Dave started... which is why we only need a brief check to make > sure they're OK. We're not excluding anything.
Folks, To emphasize: <http://dkim.org/ietf-dkim.htm#errata> Includes a pointer to a diff file between the latest draft and the pre-vote draft. The editing exercise was a matter of folding in the 3 circulated texts and, I believe, the correction Ellen offered. Since my bookkeeping skills are poor, it won't be a surprise if I missed something. That said, the diff file should make it trivial for folk to find any errors. d/ ps. A small distraction will be the chunk of IPR boilerplate. The latest draft uses the latest boilerplate. For those not following this bit of IETF process work, it's been confusing and unstable for some months. Happily, the xml2rfc that the draft is coded in makes it trivial for conversion to txt or html to pickup whatever the latest boilerplate should be. -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html