Doug Otis <doug.mtv...@gmail.com> writes: > On Apr 10, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> Barry Leiba wrote: >>> As chair, I note that any attempt to use the "errata" format of the >>> update document to *remove* text will be fraught. The text will >>> still exist (and will, in fact, be repeated in this document). >>> >>> As a participant, my inclination would be to have the update >>> replace the whole Appendix D like this: >> ... >>> But I could also accept leaving Appendix D as it is for now, and >>> dealing with it in the 4871bis effort. >> >> >> I'd like to strongly encourage the working group to defer this >> change until the -bis work. > > Agreed.
Agreed, too. We should settle DKIM-Base in stable as soon as possible. -- Byung-Hee HWANG, KNU ∑ WWW: http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
