Wietse Venema wrote: > +0.99 > > This clarifies what is the primary identifier that signers > intend to send to assessors. > > If it helps to avoid stepping on sensitive toes, you could drop > the last sentence, but I can live with it.
+1 (rounding up) And, by the way, I'm speaking as operator of a popular reputation assessment service. -- J.D. Falk Return Path Inc http://www.returnpath.net/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
