On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:07 PM, <bill.ox...@cox.com> wrote: > +1 +1
> <t>For signers and verifiers that have been using the i= tag as the > primary value that is delivered to the assessor, a software change to > using the d= tag is intended. > </t> s/intended/required/ possibly? Otherwise I'm good with this change. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
