Barry, This looks good, although the schedule seems very aggressive. I think it would be very helpful to know that there are volunteers for each component, so that they can get a running start. Are there?
Eliot On 3/12/10 5:49 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > OK, let's see... I've seen no wordsmithing of the proposed charter > text, so that stands as it is (but see below). Based on the very > limited discussion of milestones and dates, I've come up with the > following for y'all to bash: > > +++ Milestones +++ > 1. Produce an interoperability report for DKIM base... July 2010 > > 2. Produce a working group I-D detailing deployment and effectiveness > data for DKIM base... Sept 2010 > > 3. Produce a working group I-D detailing deployment and effectiveness > data for ADSP... Nov 2010 > > 4. Produce a working group I-D addressing issues related to mailing > lists... Dec 2010 > > 5. Update overview and deployment informational RFCs as appropriate, > and/or produce one or more new informational RFCs from information > obtained above... Feb 2011 > > > The discussion has raised the issue of working with IDNs and EAI. Do > we have consensus add a charter item for that? Is it necessary that > we do? If we want one, someone please propose charter text and one or > more milestones for it. > > Barry, as chair > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
