Dave CROCKER wrote: > On 4/22/2010 9:34 PM, John Levine wrote: > >> For anyone who's working on the list management BCP: >> >> I sign all my outgoing mail, and I have a feedback loop set up with >> Yahoo, which being very modern and advanced keys on signatures, not IP >> addresses. A few days ago I sent some messages to one of the Freebsd >> mailing lists. Today some Yahoo user who subscribes to that list hit >> the spam button. Freebsd's list software (Mailman, I think) doesn't >> sign, and doesn't strip any headers. So what happened? Yahoo saw my >> signature and sent the reports to me, which was of course useless >> since I don't run the list. >> >> This is not a hypothetical problem--all of my recent Yahoo FBL reports >> > > > If I understand correctly, you established a private arrangement with Yahoo. > Yahoo chooses to create a unique interpretation for the presence of a DKIM > signature, which treats it as an override to the MailFrom. And from this, > you > are asserting a new, general rule about DKIM handling? >
That is exactly my reaction: the way to deal with broken software is to fixate and blame the pointer to the broken software? Madness lies that way. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
