> -----Original Message----- > From: John Levine [mailto:jo...@iecc.com] > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:55 PM > To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Cc: Murray S. Kucherawy > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM vs. MIME > > Although I see the point in this particular case, it seems to me that > it would be a hopeless rathole to try to catalog and account for all > of the semantics of every possible header line and the set of possible > modifications to each header that do or do not make a semantic > difference. Looking at the RFCs, I can't tell whether the boundary > string in Content-Type: is supposed to be case sensitive, but the > addresses in To:, From:, Cc;, and so forth certainly are, and I > wouldn't want to get into an argument about whether the Subject: line > is.
That's my perspective as well. > PS: Needless to say, this supports my observation that the number of > list managers that don't break DKIM signature is insignificant. For now, anyway. It's obvious to me, though, that a lists BCP from this WG would be an extremely good idea. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
