I found this part of Allessandro's message somewhat scary. I thought we got past the point where l=0 was considered a viable option for anyone to use?
Tony Hansen On 4/24/2010 10:14 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > ... > A DKIM signature with an "l=" passes the DKIM module, but [...] > > Some servers rewrite MIME boundaries or prologue. I'm planning to set > "l=0" for all but text/plain messages. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html