>F2F was created in a kinder, gentler time, when address spoofing >wasn't nearly as much of a problem as it is now. The fact that F2F >hasn't evolved to avoid spoofing users' addresses is a problem that >is only made more tangible by email authentication.
I have to agree with Mike (alert the media!) that this seems to be a solution looking for a problem. There are F2F systems all over the net, and the amount of spam or hostile spoofage we get from them is trivial. It might be worth noting that a well-run F2F system can put its own signature on the mail, regardless of which of the many possible approaches it uses to set up the To:, From:, Reply-To:, and other visible headers. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
