> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- > boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 6:23 AM > To: Ian Eiloart > Cc: DKIM List > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available > > >> There's a fairly key difference you're missing here. For ADSP, each > >> domain publishes what it thinks is its own policy, so if you look at a > >> million domains, you have to guess about the competence of a million > mail > >> system managers. > >> > >> On the other hand, if you use one or two published drop lists, you can > >> afford to look at them and choose ones whose administrators are > >> competent, without having to individually vet each entry. > > > > Of course, I could also keep list of competent publishers of MX records. > > Indeed you could. And if the collateral damage from trying to use inept > MX records were as bad as the damage from trying to use inept ADSP > records, you probably would. >
John, I would appreciate you describing in detail this "collateral damage". If it involves discarding of mail from the domain in question then it is not collateral. What else do you have for us? Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
