--On 29 July 2010 20:53:40 +0200 "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-li...@cybernothing.org> wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Ian Eiloart wrote: > >> --On 26 July 2010 18:24:34 +0200 "J.D. Falk" >> <jdfalk-li...@cybernothing.org> wrote: >> >>> I think it's because, when you implement most protocols, if your end is >>> broken then you can't even talk to the other end. With ADSP, if your >>> end is broken then you can still talk SMTP and even sign with DKIM, but >>> the other end may silently discard your message. There's no feedback. >> >> About 90% of the email sent to my personal email address ends up in a >> Gmail junk mail folder, that I never check. There's no feedback there, >> either. > > As far as SMTP is concerned, that mail was successfully delivered. > huh? The complaint is that the message is silently discarded somewhere downstream, and the sender gets no feedback. How can it matter what the technical means of achieving this are? -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
