On 08/03/2010 09:15 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- >> boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Michael Thomas >> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 7:59 AM >> To: Rolf E. Sonneveld >> Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org >> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to >> preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM >> signature >> >> When we wrote our dkim implementation, we did a bunch of work within >> the >> existing DKIM framework (using l= and z=) that allowed us to get most >> original signatures to reverify through mailing lists (~95%). No work >> needed on the mailing list software at all. > > But didn't we also say that such reverified signatures don't get any > additional meaning with 'z=' reprocessing?
Sorry, I don't understand. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
