--On 4 August 2010 10:07:36 -0700 Dave CROCKER <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> > What is the security model that makes this expectation of preservation > important and reasonable, given that it is so easily and whimsically > violated by a common recipient-selectable setting? I think the identified problem is one of deliverability, not security. However, if there's a need to trust the original sender, and you don't quite trust the list to get that right for you, then the implication is that the recipient (the person with the need) should not select a digest mode. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html