On 8/14/2010 8:50 PM, Daniel Black wrote: > > I intially saw a need for a MUA considerations because: > * I still hope DKIM will help protect email identity
"email identity" is an ambiguous term. All sorts of value-added enhancements might be possible, on top of DKIM, but "protecting email identity" isn't really what DKIM is defined to do. > * end users rely, or should rely, on their MUA to present verified identity > information in an easily digestable way. Human usability issues with respect to security is, at best, extremely poorly understood. The state of the design art appears to have no idea what is effective. > * MLMs break signatures and MUA will still need to present verified identity As noted, you are seeking to have DKIM perform functions it was not designed to perform. There should be no surprise that it falls shy of your desired mark. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html