On Monday, August 30, 2010 02:03:45 pm Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > I'd like some help tackling the next version of the MLM draft. People seem > to have varying ideas about what should be removed and perhaps appear in > other documents now. I need some consensus on a direction in which to > proceed. > > So can I please get some +1s/-1s on each of the following: > > (1) Split the document into three documents: A DKIM MLM BCP that discusses > signing and verifying in the context of MLMs with no value-add items > addressed, a DKIM MLM Informational that discusses possible value-add > enhancements to MLMs in the DKIM world, and a non-WG BCP about mailing > lists irrespective of DKIM (Dave's proposal);
-1. I don't think the first part has much value without the second (if I understand the split correctly). > (2) Tear out everything having to do with making author signatures survive > list relaying, dropping all that text altogether, and instead pointing > people at S/MIME or PGP (John's proposal); -1. While I think it's premature to specify "THE" way to solve such problems, I think it's useful to present possibilities for implementers to consider. I don't think redefining the problem so that a class of failures are no longer failures is helpful. > (3) Something else (and specify what that might be). > > AND... > > If you support any of the above, please take a few minutes to include some > pointers to what text you want changed/exported and in what way. Actual > diffs would be ideal, but I'll take point-form commentary as well. I'll try and do this, but not today. > AND... > > If you advocate for a general MLM BCP, this will be a non-WG document (it's > outside of our charter) so I'd love to get some MLM operators and > developers involved. (Maybe this should take place on ietf-822 or maybe > on a new non-WG list; suggestions welcome.) Expressions of interest in > that work would be appreciated. I'll approach the APPS ADs about a venue. > > Thanks, > -MSK Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
