> But what everyone has been telling me is that it would be better in > fact to go and deploy something before drafting the I-D and debating > it here. This is the main reason why I went quiet on these lists > since the Barcelona MAAWG meeting (until this week).
Yes indeedy. Keeping in mind that no good deed goes unpunished, you can be sure that whatever Paypal does, you'll get complaints about it, but it sure would be nice to have running code we can poke and try out and see how useful it is. R's, John Minor niggle: the order of writing the code and the I-D is not critical. It's not a bad to do them at the same time, so that you can circulate the I-D among people whose opinons you value and get possibly helpful suggestions before the concrete around the code hardens too much. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html