Hi J.D., What an interesting conversation you've stoked!
On 9/14/10 9:35 PM, J.D. Falk wrote: > ...but not for the reasons the anti-ADSP folks keep bringing up. > > DKIM is failing because every discussion about actually /using/ DKIM > inevitably gets stuck in the same old argument about ADSP. Doesn't even > matter what the argument is about anymore; it stops all forward progress > every time. And we keep letting it happen -- actively participating, even, > including me. > > Continuing to argue these same points over and over is disrespectful of our > colleagues both on and off this list, and of the IETF process. Without getting all emotional about all of this, I would think first things first. If we could sort the identification of the {user domain entry point or enterprise root/top level or whatever you want to call that thing above .ac.uk or .com or sf.ca.us} domain, and it is something that we would like to have, then that will offer us a number of interesting opportunities. Thanks to Dave Crocker for not letting that one go. It's work that needs doing, albeit perhaps not here, even though we may benefit. FWIW I have some thoughts as to how this might go, if some people are interested. I will *not* be in Beijing to discuss them, but would be happy to do so if folks want to hear about them. Eliot
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html