> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- > boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Macdonald > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:18 PM > To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Dave CROCKER <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote: > > John, et al, > > > > ***** > > > > Does anyone else have comments on the draft??? > > > > ***** > > > > I just reviewed the diffs: > > Section 3.9: > > INFORMATIVE DISCUSSION: This document does not require the value > of the SDID or AUID to match the identifier in any other message > header field. > > should "the identifier" be "an identifier"? > > I cringed at SDID and AUID, but I don't have any better suggestions at > the moment. > > Reviewing the flow of the document, I suggest moving section 2.7-2.11 > to be after section 2.2. > > > -- > Jeff Macdonald > Ayer, MA
+1 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
