On Thursday, September 23, 2010 03:16:53 pm John R. Levine wrote: > >> Ian, this makes no sense to me. If a signing domain is concerned enough > >> to choose to implement ADSP, why would they reduce what they are signing > >> to accommodate a small percentage of their mail going to MLMs that they > >> may or may not be able to identify? > > I'm with you. All of this emphasis on complex designs for MLMs strikes me > as a waste of time, since it's a tiny corner of the mail space that has > not historically been a vector for abuse, and shows no sign of becoming > one. > > That's why my advice is that lists should sign their mail, which is easy > and at worst harmless, and we're done. > > R's, > John
In that case, we should just say we're done. I see zero value in a document that says people should sign mail. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
