> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] > On Behalf Of John Levine > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 10:52 AM > To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Cc: ietf-d...@kitterman.com > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was, > draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs > > >>This might be a good time to remind people that MLMs in their > >>current form are not broken, and any proposal that requires them to > >>stop doing something that they're currently doing, like rewriting > >>messages or adding message tags, is a non-starter. > > >Since nothing requires anyone do anything with respect to DKIM, I'm > >hard pressed to imagine something that doesn't meet that requirement. > > I was thinking of the various proposals to rewrite From: addresses, to > outlaw subject tags and message footers, and otherwise change the > behaviors that MLM users expect in order to make them conform to > various ideas of how DKIM and/or ADSP are supposed to work.
If the current MLM draft attempts to "outlaw" anything, that should be corrected. But I don't think it hurts anyone to point out that an MLM that actually does want to try to preserve author signatures, for whatever reason, should realize what options it has. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
