> -----Original Message----- > From: SM [mailto:s...@resistor.net] > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 4:24 PM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Subject: RE: Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01 > > >Sure, but are those numbers permanent such that later readers will > >find the same data, or should we describe each of the items that > >came out of the Interop? > > The level of detail for the report is left to the author. If we want > later readers to find the information, we could list the > interoperability issues in the document.
I decided I was being lazy and added a summary of the errata to the report, so they're there with their numbers for the next version. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
