On 10/04/2010 10:41 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > Thus begins working group last call on the DKIM implementation and > interoperability report, draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report > The working group last call will run through Friday, 22 October, 2010. > > This implementation report will be used to advance the DKIM base spec > to Draft Standard. Everyone please review it, and post > comments/issues. Please also post here if you've reviewed it and think > it's ready to go.
I've reviewed it and came across the following: Chapter 2: as for DKIM specific definitions used in this document, they cannot be found in [EMAIL-ARCH]. Please add [DKIM] here as source of definitions. Par. 3.2 - 3.4: these paragraphs are a bit 'vague', due to terms like 'Some implementations [...]', 'Some test cases [...]', 'at least two implementations...'. Presumably this has to do with the fact that the interoperability event took place long time ago? If so, I'd suggest to include a sentence to describe the difficulty to gather all relevant information, three years after the event took place. To make these paragraphs a bit less 'vague' I would like to suggest to include the original set(s) of test messages and the original interoperability test plan(s), if still around somewhere. Par. 4.1.2: [...] Where "list mail" is defined as [...] Should this not be: [...] Where "Non-List Mail" is defined as [...]? Murray, thanks for the work! /rolf _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
