--On 8 October 2010 15:38:46 +0100 Charles Lindsey <c...@clerew.man.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:18:19 +0100, Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote: > >> The larger issue here is would anybody rush out to close this MUST. >> I think that it is highly unlikely that anybody is going to care at this >> point. That goes for *any* new MUST, IMO: unless it's really a serious >> protocol endangering problem, it shouldn't be in the -bis document. Save >> new MUST's for genuine emergencies. > > But it IS a serious protocol endangering problem. No, I don't think so. The protocols are quite clear. rfc5322 section 3.6 says there must be exactly one From: header. If there are two, then you don't have a compliant email. Why any software should assign a positive trust value (like claiming the Author address has been verified) to a non-compliant email, I don't know. Anyway, this is clearly a problem with rfc5322 compliance, not with DKIM. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
