On Oct 25, 2010, at 8:07 AM, John R. Levine wrote: >> The one that stands out is "multipart/signed" (from RFC1847) which drops to >> about a 65% survival rate. I don't know much about how this is typically >> formatted or treated enroute, but it was easily the biggest outlier in the >> report. Not sure if that should be a surprise to us or not. > > I'm surprised. That suggests something often adds the S/MIME signature after > the DKIM signature, but as far as I know, S/MIME signatures are usually > applied by the MUA.
Someone was hawking a box to sign and verify RFC 2015 PGP signatures at the enterprise firewall a few years back. That'd break DKIM signatures with a multipart/signed outermost type. Cheers, Steve _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
