> And so, for example, controversial items such as MUA discussion were > preserved. Although they might be worthy of further discussion, that > discussion has NOTHING to do with the current round of effort.
In the list of nits I sent along some months ago, I noted that there was a fair amount of text that implied that a DKIM verifier produces an edited version of the message it's verifying. I gather we agree that it doesn't, so, uh, what's the new draft going to say? Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
