>> The problem with switching to RFC5890 is the potential that that constitutes >> an >> actual protocol change of a type not allowed for going to Draft Standard.
I asked my IDNA expert, who said that the definitive answer is "it depends". He suggests our chair ask our AD to check with the IESG. I just looked through my three year archive of DKIM signatures and as far as I can tell, I've literally never seen one with an IDN, much less one with an IDN that would be different, so I think we can make a plausible argument that the practical change is imperceptible. Regards, John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
