>> Sorry, this message makes no sense. The IETF has been working on non-ASCII >> domain names and >e-mail for over a decade, and we are certainly not going to do random things >that ignore that >effort and the many RFCs that describe the use of IDNs in the DNS. > >Sounds like what we actually need is some way to point to the relevant work >elsewhere in the >IETF, even though it's apparently a moving target with many strong opinions >continuing to >shove it in multiple directions. Is it permissible to simply reference the >working group's >tools page?
The current language references RFC 3490, my proposed change references RFC 5890, which supersedes 3490. The title of 5890 is "Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework." How much more of a pointer does anyone need? R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
