> Barry replied: > > Dave further tweaks: >> INFORMATIVE NOTE: Although use of rsa-sha256 is strongly encouraged, >> some senders might prefer to use rsa-sha1 when balancing security >> strength against performance, complexity, or other needs. �However, >> compliant verifiers might not implement rsa-sha1; they will treat >> such messages as unsigned. > > WFM. > > Barry, as participant
+1 -- HLS _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
