Dave CROCKER wrote: > The best I can suggest is something along the lines of noting that > assessment-level heuristics can be aided by certain choices of signature d= > names. And then specifying what they might be, so that both signers and > verifiers know how to encourage success for the heuristics. > > mumble.
Chuckling. Warning: Such mumbles only presage more far-reaching developments to come. :) There will always be a choice or choices for the selection of a SDID that will reflect a controlled decision for the equal or better outcome, hopefully not worst. I don't see this done in random. -- HLS _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
