> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] > On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER > Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:42 PM > To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output summary > > > 4.9. Output Requirements > > > > The output of the verifier MUST embody:
Correction: "For each signature on the message that was not ignored by the verifier, the output..." > I note that there is similar text in the current Section 3.9 -- which will > become 3.10 -- concerning SDID/AUID: > > > Hence, DKIM's mandatory output to a receive-side Identity Assessor is > > a single domain name. Within the scope of its use as DKIM output, > > the name has only basic domain name semantics; any possible owner- > > specific semantics are outside the scope of DKIM. That is, within > > its role as a DKIM identifier, additional semantics cannot be assumed > > by an Identity Assessor. > > I suggest deleting the first sentence and moving the remainder tot he > new 3.9. WFM. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
