Overall, I believe a MLM SHOULD always hash headers it adds or changes. Some additional headers often common with MLM are:
Precedence: Errors-to: What is the reasoning not to include these in the MLM core headers listed? I have read somewhere some ESP/ISP receivers (YAHOO?) use Precedence: header in part of their "secret sauce" to increase acceptance. N'est-ce pas? The Errors-To: header does have MLM history and it continues to be user by many MLMs. Our MLM uses it and the IETF-DKIM MLM also uses it. There is a historical note [1] this header may be harmful, but in a DKIM era, this header can be protected like other MLM core headers. -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-message-headers/current/msg00038.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html