> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] > On Behalf Of Hector Santos > Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 7:08 AM > To: Alessandro Vesely > Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output summary - Keep your Eye on the Prize! > > Therefore, since we don't know, we discourage usage, exploration.
Actually the current text specifically enables exploration. This is important, because: > 1) Empirical Fact! > > We know SDID is showing a very low payoff and very useless utility > with a majority of DKIM mail coming from unknown signers and spammers Our data support the opposite conclusion; finding patterns in the data accumulated so far is proving to be rather useful, even though spammers are embracing DKIM and the AUID and RFC5322.From are not considered. So I don't know who "we" is, but it doesn't include me. > 2) Current Implementations API Fact! > > We know ODID is used for ADSP lookups, optionally or not. I don't know what the "or not" means here. ADSP only uses RFC5322.From, but ADSP itself is entirely optional. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
