On Tue, 10 May 2011 00:02:36 +0100, Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote:
> That was quick. I believe we already have enough objections to say > that we do NOT have rough consensus for deprecating l= at this time. > I'll close the issue in the tracker (issue #26), and we will leave it > as it is. > > Of course, folks may, if it makes them feel good, continue to register > objections here. Yes, leave it be. Point out some problems if you wish, but no more. People seem to be using it. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: c...@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
