Hi Alessandro, At 03:22 16-05-2011, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >However, relaxed header canonicalization is not MIME compatible. In >particular, RFC 2045 says
I don't think that it was ever meant to be MIME compatible. >Many MTAs still add a Domainkey-Signature. They could stop that, and >add a legacy DKIM-Signature along with a one that features the newer >canonicalization instead. Setting the pace in this manner can keep >DKIM development alive indefinitely. The MTAs that are still adding a Domainkey-Signature will keep doing that irrespective of what goes on in this working group. I prefer not to keep DKIM development alive indefinitely if the sole purpose is not to produce results. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
