>> In my experience, the reputation of the list is unrelated to the >> reputation of its participants.
>Given how little DKIM-related reputation work has been done, deployed and >heavily used so far, perhaps we should all be a bit cautious about taking >existing practices and treating them as definitive of future needs and uses. In case it wasn't clear, I wasn't referring to DKIM reputation. I whitelist mail from lists I'm subscribed to using List-ID or some other bits of stable header text. In theory evil people could forge them, in practice it's never been a problem. So having a DKIM signature to be the stable text would be nice, but wouldn't fundamentally change what I do already. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
