Section 11 reference DKIM for Domain Authentication. Something about white-listing the big guys.
I am thinking $$$ here. Big Guys need to pay me to white list them. Mark Delany wrote: > On 22Jul11, O'Reirdan, Michael allegedly wrote: >> Chaps >> >> I would like to bring to your attention and solicit comments on the >> following draft. >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html//draft-oreirdan-rosenwald-ipv6mail-transition-00 > > Hi Mike. On first glance it doesn't look like much of this document is > relevant to DKIM or vice versa. This is unsurprising since DKIM has > little to do with IP addresses. > > On a non-DKIM related front, your document talks about "connection > exhaustion" as a consequence of the increased address space with > IPV6. I would have thought the maximum number of connections is a > function of the number of clients (malicious or otherwise) rather than > the address space they use. Are you anticipating a larger number of > new SMTP clients as a consequence of IPV6? > > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html > > -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
